Top latest Five winchester load data 296 Urban news
Top latest Five winchester load data 296 Urban news
Blog Article
and have them examined for strain and velocity to check out Everything you're basically likely to get when you load them. Them, whenever they transform satisfactory, load them precisely the way you did once you had them examined.
The cheddites truly feed much better in my Dillon presses as opposed to winchesters. I don’t know if it’s because of the copper coating slides better around the stainless feed plate, Nevertheless they unquestionably function better. I’m gonna be really hard pressed to return to winchesters. Ed
As for reliability it's all there within the open up: CX2000 and Fiocchi 615 are quite possibly the most reliable while in the EU industry with CX1000 staying quite insconsistent (sometimes as robust as CX2000; occasionally as weak as Fio615).
It is kinda like individuals that utilize a slower burning powder declaring to own diminished recoil than the usual speedier burning powder, Even with equally loads being a similar velocity and ejecta body weight. It has to be All those super duper recoil decreasing wads.
dogchaser37 mentioned: What you're claiming is that all The brand new numerous powder generate a lot more stress than the initial plenty? Click on to develop...
In comparing loads with every little thing the exact same other than primers, fed 209A has much more tension than Cheddite. They are revealed loads in 12ga which i evaluate.
This can be an more mature thread, you might not receive a response, and could be reviving an previous thread. Make sure you look at making a new thread.
Winchester primers do give some people matches when applying with Remington hulls at reprime. It usually necessitates an adjustment into the rammer tube, on my 9000H I had to drop it one/eight" from wherever it was established when making use of AA CF and AA HS hulls. You'll find other remedies However they are already crushed to Loss of life in various other threads.
i.e. within the properly sane Remington hull load circled in pink that may be a cushty ten,000 PSI having a W209, what would the impact be for the primer battery cup (button?) face if you simply switched from the W209 to some Ched 209 w/o decreasing powder ?
Oh, I'll shoot them. I just have not noticed a bulge in winchester large rifle magnum primers the head like I have with these primers. Just attempting to determine the lead to/solution.
There are actually specfic directions on the correct adjustment with the rammer tube for primer seating. 2nd quite a few Remington hulls, Gun Golf equipment likely the massive offender, have excess plastic that curls inward into your primer pocket generating points tougher though seating a primer. And that's why the thread about employing a drill little bit to remove the plastic and make primer seating much easier.
It remains to be as limited as it ever was. The forearm and rear stock exhibit some signs of overuse. But I am certain she has various thousand rounds left in her.
From what various of us have witnessed, that deal primer pierces easity. This causes swift erosion with the firing pins which causes the situation of piercing to worsen Which causes much more Firing pin problems.
Has any person observed/performed any screening to find out how the Cheddite functionality stacks up vs the Winchester? I checked the Alliant and Hodgdon Internet sites, but only identified a number of recipes applying Cheddite in Remington hulls (which I use,) and only with Further-lite powder.